Topics ▾
Workflows ·

Benchmark your assistants on your own top tasks

Intermediate, 20 minutes

Ask each assistant for the tasks it does most for you, pick the overlap, give them the same tools and short prompts, then score the results side by side.

How this helps you

You decide which assistant handles which job based on your own tasks, not someone else's leaderboard.

✦ Try it
I'm comparing assistants on my real work. From our history, list the top 10 tasks you do for me, most frequent first, with one line on what a great result looks like for each. Then list the connectors and skills you used for them, and anything you couldn't do because you lacked access.

Fill in: No placeholders. Send it to each assistant you're comparing, then build your task list from the overlap.

What they did

Claire Vo of How I AI ran a personal benchmark of four agents, including Grok Bot, on nine of her real tasks. She started by asking each agent for the top 10 tasks it does for her, then picked the tasks most common across them plus a few that test different skills: drafting a Slack reply in her voice, cutting a short video, fixing a bug, making a thumbnail, triaging her inbox for to-dos, a family newspaper, explaining a homework question, shoe shopping and a launch video. Before running it she checked that every agent had roughly the same connectors and skills. Prompts were one line, written the way she'd really ask, with a run sheet saying what to answer if an agent asked a question. She timed each run and scored the results herself. In her test Grok Bot came out on top overall, winning the thumbnail, to-do and shopping tasks, while it was weaker at cutting video and coding. Her takeaways: pick the agent for the job, and access matters, so give them the same tools before comparing.

Who it's for: People paying for more than one assistant, or running several Bots, who want to decide what goes where.

Before you start

How to try it

  1. Ask each assistant: 'What are the top 10 tasks you do for me?' and collect the lists.
  2. Pick 5 to 9 tasks that appear on more than one list, plus one or two that test something different (a design, a purchase search, a document).
  3. Check each assistant has the same connectors and skills for those tasks, so you're comparing the assistant and not its access.
  4. Write a one-line prompt per task, the way you'd normally ask, and a note on what you'll say if it asks a question. Run each prompt and note the time.
  5. Score each result (did it finish, quality, time) and decide which assistant gets which kind of job.

What to expect

A small table: 7 tasks down the side, assistants across the top, each cell with done or not, minutes taken and a 1 to 5 score, plus a line on which assistant you'll use for what.

Common mistakes

Related tips

Worth knowingCarved from a segment of this video starting at 2:09. Paraphrased by us; watch the original for the full walkthrough.
Next in Workflows →An incident routine that investigates before you wake up

Learn more: Grok Bot Use Cases: Real Workflows From Real Users · All Grok Bot workflows tips

Related Grok Bot tips

More Workflows →
Workflows

Two habits that make usage last: batch requests, send words not screenshots

Every message makes a Bot reread the chat, so send related requests together, skip 'thanks' replies, and paste text or cropped images instead of full screenshots and PDFs.

How this helps you The same work uses fewer messages and less image reading, so your weekly usage goes further without dropping any jobs.
Spotted by Sharbel A. (YouTube) · 3 Nov 2026
Workflows

Let your Bot cancel free trials and unused subscriptions

Three built-in templates from 0.78: start a trial and cancel it before it bills, cancel plans you don't use, and watch renewal prices.

How this helps you You stop paying for trials and plans you forgot about, and nothing is cancelled without your OK.
Spotted by @spectnfa · 31 Oct 2026
Workflows

From support form to fix: a webhook, a Bot and a Cursor cloud agent

A support form posts to a webhook, a Bot picks up the ticket, and for bugs it starts a Cursor cloud agent that reproduces the issue, adds a failing test and opens a pull request for an engineer to review.

How this helps you By the time an engineer looks at a bug, it has repro steps, a test and a proposed fix waiting.
Spotted by Grok, Santi Garza (YouTube) · 29 Oct 2026