Topics ▾
Multi-bot setups ·

Build a five-Bot crew where each Bot owns one job

Intermediate, 15 minutes

Skai's clipping army is a clean roster pattern: Scout, Clipper, Judge, Poster, Accountant, each with one job, connectors, schedules, and a human approval gate before posting.

How this helps you

Multi-Bot projects stay debuggable because each failure has an owner.

✦ Try it
You are [role] in a five-Bot crew. Your only job: [job]. Inputs you accept: [inputs]. Outputs you must hand to [next_bot]: [outputs]. If a required field is missing, write unknown and stop. Never post publicly or spend money; ask me to approve.

Fill in: [role], [job], [inputs], [next_bot], [outputs]: fill per Bot.

What they did

Skai connects Higgsfield, then builds five Bots. Scout finds campaigns and writes only verifiable rules to a board. Clipper edits. Judge scores and keeps a shortlist. Poster drafts titles and waits for approval before posting. Accountant checks results on a night routine. The useful general lesson is role design and handoffs, not a promise about payouts. Fresh upload with no comments yet. Steal the roster shape for any craft pipeline (research → draft → QA → publish → measure), swapping Higgsfield for the connector your work actually needs.

Who it's for: Builders ready for a small specialist team instead of one overloaded Bot.

Before you start

How to try it

  1. Write a roster of five jobs max; forbid any Bot from doing two roles.
  2. Connect the real craft app before you write prompts (editing, posting, analytics).
  3. Create Scout first with a board and a rule: record only what you can verify.
  4. Chain Clipper -> Judge -> Poster with explicit handoff messages and an approval stop before publish.
  5. Add a nightly Accountant routine that writes numbers back to the board.
  6. Run one supervised test day and note which Bot guessed instead of verifying.
  7. Document the campaign or project board fields once so every Bot reads the same schema.

What to expect

Scout fills a campaign board; Clipper only starts after rules are marked verified; Poster waits for your OK.

Common mistakes

Related tips

Worth knowingMulti-Bot projects stay debuggable because each failure has an owner.
Next in Multi-bot setups →Start with a chief of staff Bot

Learn more: How to Use Grok Bot: A Beginner's Guide (2026) · All Grok Bot multi-bot setups tips

Related Grok Bot tips

More Multi-bot setups →
Multi-bot setups

Audit how you manage your Bot team, not just their prompts

Michael runs an 8-point MANAGEMENT OPTIMISATION AUDIT on his own delegation, approvals and follow-through across a 20-Bot team, then pastes a full prompt into Chief of Staff.

How this helps you You find the human bottlenecks that make a 20-Bot team feel slower than a 3-Bot team.
Spotted by @Michael_Fenech_ · 6 Nov 2026
Multi-bot setups

Point your Bot team at Notion's shared agent brain

Michael Fenech wires Notion's agent shared-brain setup so every Grok Bot reads the same decisions and corrections without stuffing full context into every chat.

How this helps you Your Bots stop arguing from different memories, and you update rules once instead of re-teaching every specialist.
Spotted by @Michael_Fenech_ · 5 Nov 2026
Multi-bot setups

Sync two Grok Bot plans through a private fleet brain

Jordan runs two Ultra plans on one laptop and syncs bots, skills and memories through a private GitHub repo so he can switch accounts without losing context.

How this helps you If you truly need two plan pools, you can switch accounts without rebuilding every Bot by hand.
Spotted by Jordan Rafealov (YouTube) · 4 Nov 2026